Federal Court Strikes Down Washington State’s Felon Disfranchisement Law in Landmark Voting Rights Case
Posted By The Editors | January 6th, 2010 | Category: Political Participation | No Comments »
Print This Post
By The Editors
In a precedent-setting decision, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals today struck down the state of Washington’s law barring felons from voting. It ruled that the law violates the federal Voting Rights Act because of widespread racism, racial discrimination and bias in the state’s criminal justice system.
The Court declared that there was “compelling” evidence – which Washington state officials did not contest — that “in the total population of potential ‘felons’…minorities are more likely than whites to be searched, arrested, detained, and ultimately prosecuted.”
It went on to say that “If those decision points are infected with racial bias, resulting in some people becoming felons not just because they have committed a crime, but because of their race, then that felon status cannot, under section 2 of the VRA, disqualify felons from voting.”
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act forbids any unit of government from enacting any law or regulation that prevents or dilutes the voting rights of blacks, other Americans of color and members of a language minority group.
The ruling came in a law suit, Farrakhan v. Gregoire, originally brought in 1996 by several black, Latino and Native American citizens of Washington state who had lost their right to vote because of felony convictions. It marks the first time a federal court has declared that systemic racism infects the procedures of the criminal justice to such a degree that a record of incarceration cannot be used to deny an ex-offender the right to vote. The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund was the lead counsel for the plaintiffs in the case
John Payton, LDF President and Director-Counsel, said that “This landmark ruling recognizes that racial discrimination in Washington’s criminal justice system has infected the State’s political process. The result is that Black, Latino and Native America persons convicted of felonies in Washington are disproportionately denied the right to vote.”
Officials of LDF, along with many others, have long asserted that the structural racism of the criminal justice system plays a significant role in the sharply disproportionate numbers of African Americans, Hispanic Americans and Native Americans incarcerated in the country’s jails and prisons.
The substantial increase in the latter groups’ rate of incarceration –
long with the greater exercise of political power by blacks and Latinos — since the 1970s has, in turn, led to a more aggressive questioning of the fairness of state laws which bar temporarily or forever persons convicted of a felony. Those assertions and the demand that felon disenfranchisement laws be significantly changed have grown more numerous since the mid-1990s due to several highly-visible election controversies.
This week’s federal court ruling is sure to stoke the debate even more.
As a result of Washington state’s current felon disfranchisement statute, 24 percent of black men in the state and 15 percent of its entire black population have lost their voting rights because of a felony conviction. Collectively, African Americans, Latinos and Native Americans represent only 12% of Washington’s population, but comprise 36% of the State’s incarcerated population.
“The evidence showed that the rate at which blacks, Latinos and Native Americans are convicted of felony offenses and consequently disqualified from voting is not reflective of their actual participation in criminal behavior, said Ryan P. Haygood, Co-Director of LDF’s Political Participation Group.
“These racial disparities tell a troubling story,” he continued, “of minority overrepresentation in the criminal justice system resulting not from any public safety imperative but rather from discrimination. The Court recognized that our democracy cannot be eroded by compounding this serious injury through felon disfranchisement.”
The plaintiffs in the case are represented by the University Legal Assistance law clinic at Gonzaga Law School and LDF.
“We are pleased by the Ninth Circuit’s ruling today, which recognizes that discriminatory disfranchisement laws undermine core American ideals of fairness and democracy,” said Larry Weiser, Director of the University Legal Assistance law clinic at Gonzaga Law School.
Nationally, more than 5.3 million Americans are denied the right to vote, the foundation, Haygood said, of all of Americans’ other rights. An estimated 2 million of the disfranchised, roughly 38%, are African Americans. Maine and Vermont are the only states which permit those incarcerated to vote by absentee ballot from prison.
Mission Critical: Succeeding at Black America’s Last Chance
International Women’s Day: Crossing Bridges for Women Around the World
Detroit Diary: Don’t Leave Young Workers Behind
Black History Month is Over. But Should it be?
Cartoon: March 12, 2010
AIG Lenders Pay For Discriminating Against Blacks
Victory, For Now, For Gay Marriage in D.C.
“Precious” and the Oscars
We’re Not the Na’vis: The True Ecology of Avatar
The Abdication of Desirée Rogers
Top 25 African-American Films of All Time
My Top 10 African-American TV Shows of All Time
Sarah Rector: The Richest Colored Girl in the World
‘If You Learned It, Then You Should Have Got an A On It’
What the Amy Bishop Case Says About Race and Crime
‘I Can’t Believe You Brought Home a White Boy’
A Fun Face?
Chemical Relaxers: The Facts Might Not Be So Relaxing
From Orange Mint and Honey to Sins of the Mother: The Power of Story Endures
LDF Defends Chicago Black Firefighters
Is That Your Child? Mothers Talk About Rearing Biracial Children
Will the ‘Real’ Michelle Obama Please Stand Up?
Mental Health Parity 2010