<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Justice Breyer on the Dred Scott Decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/28/justice-breyer-on-the-dred-scott-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/28/justice-breyer-on-the-dred-scott-decision/</link>
	<description>A civil rights blog promoting informed discourse on issues of race, justice, equality and democracy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:11:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hull</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/28/justice-breyer-on-the-dred-scott-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-9647</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 16:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=13704#comment-9647</guid>
		<description>One thing I was confused about when reading this was Breyer&#039;s repeated reference to &quot;three&quot; dissenting opinions in the Court&#039;s ruling.  This is a mistake; there were, in fact, only two: Curtis and McLean.  In total, 7 justices went along for the ride with Taney&#039;s inflammatory opinion...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I was confused about when reading this was Breyer&#8217;s repeated reference to &#8220;three&#8221; dissenting opinions in the Court&#8217;s ruling.  This is a mistake; there were, in fact, only two: Curtis and McLean.  In total, 7 justices went along for the ride with Taney&#8217;s inflammatory opinion&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

