Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Case
Posted By The Editors | March 29th, 2011 | Category: Economic Justice | Comments Off
Print This Post
March 29 — The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments today on whether the lawsuit of female employees of Wal-Mart pressing a sex-discrimination claim against the retail giant could go to trial as a class-action. The Court’s decision could have widespread ramifications. If it rules the case can go forward, the number of women involved would number at least 500,000 and leave Wal-Mart potentially facing hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. If the Court rules that press their lawsuit as a class representing all Wal-Mart female employees, it could set back the utility of class-action lawsuits in a broad range of cases.
Earlier this month the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF) filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the Supreme Court supporting the plaintiffs.
Education Reform’s Misguided Articles of Faith
Santorum Parts Company with Big Business Over Diversity
Election 2012 and The Right to Vote:The Battle for Democracy
Hold Fast to Your Dreams
The Problem that Won’t Go Away: Violence in Urban Black America
The American Gulag: Slavery By Another Name
Huffington Post: John Kline’s No Child Left Behind Bills Strike At Values Of Brown v. Board, Coalition Writes
Deval Hits the Campaign Trail for Barack
The Loving Story: A New HBO Documentary tells the love story that helped destroy Jim Crow
Indiana Top Official Convicted of Voter Fraud