<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Defenders Online &#124; A Civil Rights Blog &#187; exoneration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedefendersonline.com/tag/exoneration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com</link>
	<description>A civil rights blog promoting informed discourse on issues of race, justice, equality and democracy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:40:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Supreme Court Orders Sweeping Changes to Use of Eyewitness Identification</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/08/27/new-jersey-supreme-court-orders-sweeping-changes-to-use-of-eyewitness-identification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/08/27/new-jersey-supreme-court-orders-sweeping-changes-to-use-of-eyewitness-identification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 20:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exoneration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=18407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By <strong>The Editors</strong><br />
The New Jersey Supreme Court this week ordered sweeping changes in the way eyewitness identification is used and evaluated in the state’s criminal courts.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/08/27/new-jersey-supreme-court-orders-sweeping-changes-to-use-of-eyewitness-identification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guilty Until Proven Innocent: 267 and Counting</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/03/26/guilty-until-proven-innocent-267-and-counting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/03/26/guilty-until-proven-innocent-267-and-counting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 14:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exoneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=16932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By <strong>Lee A. Daniels</strong><br />
More and more, it’s become apparent that America has a double-sided criminal justice system</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/03/26/guilty-until-proven-innocent-267-and-counting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sherrilynn Ifill: Why We Ignored the Supreme Court’s Review of Connick v. Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/10/13/sherrilynn-ifill-why-we-ignored-the-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-review-of-connick-v-thompson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/10/13/sherrilynn-ifill-why-we-ignored-the-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-review-of-connick-v-thompson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 17:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exoneration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=15178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By <strong>The Editors</strong><br />
In a powerful opinion piece in the American Constitution Society blog this week, Sherrilynn Ifill, a law professor at the University of Maryland and a former staff attorney at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., offers a tale of two cases considered by the Supreme Court this month and examines a gripping question: Why did one draw voluminous media coverage, while the other—involving an African-American man who, though innocent, was convicted of murder and nearly executed—was virtually ignored?</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/10/13/sherrilynn-ifill-why-we-ignored-the-supreme-court%e2%80%99s-review-of-connick-v-thompson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Time Is Money, What Is Justice Worth?</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/08/17/if-time-is-money-what-is-justice-worth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/08/17/if-time-is-money-what-is-justice-worth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exoneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prison]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=14603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By <strong>Lee A. Daniels</strong>
What is the meaning and the scale of justice for this special group of Americans – the guilty until proven innocent?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/08/17/if-time-is-money-what-is-justice-worth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guilty Until Proven Innocent: The Shame of America’s Criminal Justice System</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/08/04/guilty-until-proven-innocent-the-shame-of-america%e2%80%99s-criminal-justice-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/08/04/guilty-until-proven-innocent-the-shame-of-america%e2%80%99s-criminal-justice-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 16:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exoneration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=14400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By <strong>Lee A. Daniels</strong>
Michael Anthony Green was released from the custody of the state of Texas last Friday – 27 years after being wrongly convicted for the rape of a woman that brought him a sentence of 75 years in prison.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/08/04/guilty-until-proven-innocent-the-shame-of-america%e2%80%99s-criminal-justice-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freddie Peacock’s Long Journey to Exoneration</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/02/12/freddie-peacock%e2%80%99s-long-journey-to-exoneration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/02/12/freddie-peacock%e2%80%99s-long-journey-to-exoneration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exoneration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=12330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By <strong>Maggie Taylor</strong>
Freddie Peacock was arrested in July 1976 and later convicted of attacking and raping a woman. Twenty-eight years after his parole in 1982, Peacock became the 250th person nationwide to be exonerated by DNA evidence.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/02/12/freddie-peacock%e2%80%99s-long-journey-to-exoneration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warriors for Justice: The Innocence Project Fights for Exoneration</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2009/08/25/warriors-for-justice-the-innocence-project-fights-for-exoneration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2009/08/25/warriors-for-justice-the-innocence-project-fights-for-exoneration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exoneration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=10084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By <strong>TaRessa Stovall</strong>
This independent national litigation and public policy organization was established at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University in New York City, to free the wrongfully convicted and reform the criminal justice system.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2009/08/25/warriors-for-justice-the-innocence-project-fights-for-exoneration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life After Wrongful Conviction</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2009/08/13/life-after-wrongful-conviction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2009/08/13/life-after-wrongful-conviction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exoneration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=9856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>By Olympia Duhart
<span style="font-weight: normal; ">At the age of 48, Alan J. Crotzer has spent more than half of his life behind bars: 24 years, six months, 13 days and four hours, to be precise. </span></strong>

<strong><span style="font-weight: normal; ">And he was innocent of every single charge leveled against him.</span></strong>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2009/08/13/life-after-wrongful-conviction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

