<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Defenders Online &#124; A Civil Rights Blog &#187; supreme court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedefendersonline.com/tag/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com</link>
	<description>A civil rights blog promoting informed discourse on issues of race, justice, equality and democracy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:40:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Will Decide Fairness of Cocaine Sentencing Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/11/30/supreme-court-will-decide-fairness-of-cocaine-sentencing-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/11/30/supreme-court-will-decide-fairness-of-cocaine-sentencing-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Year in Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=19903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By <strong>The Editors</strong><br />
Once the sentencing rules for an offense are changed to lesser terms, is it fair to still subject some individuals to the old, harsher rules?</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/11/30/supreme-court-will-decide-fairness-of-cocaine-sentencing-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Stays Execution of Duane Buck</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/09/16/supreme-court-stays-execution-of-duane-buck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/09/16/supreme-court-stays-execution-of-duane-buck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 22:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=18620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By The Editors The U.S. Supreme Court late Thursday stayed the scheduled execution by the state of  Texas of Duane Buck in order to review the appeal of Buck’s attorneys that his sentencing was tainted by racial bias. Buck, 48, who is African American, was convicted of the 1995 murder of his ex-girlfriend, Debra Gardner, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/09/16/supreme-court-stays-execution-of-duane-buck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regretting Jim Crow: Richard H. Poff And the Costs of White Racism</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/07/05/regretting-jim-crow-richard-h-poff-and-the-costs-of-white-racism-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/07/05/regretting-jim-crow-richard-h-poff-and-the-costs-of-white-racism-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=17952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By <strong>Lee A. Daniels</strong><br />
Given the fresh proof that the woeful neglect of American history in the schools has helped produce an astonishing ignorance of basic details of American history, it’s clearly foolish to expect that many today would recognize the name of Richard H. Poff.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/07/05/regretting-jim-crow-richard-h-poff-and-the-costs-of-white-racism-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Blocks Largest Discrimination Case in Nation&#8217;s History</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/06/21/supreme-court-blocks-largest-discrimination-case-in-nations-history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/06/21/supreme-court-blocks-largest-discrimination-case-in-nations-history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=17756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court’s ruling makes it more difficult for workers to collectively enforce their right to a discrimination-free workplace.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/06/21/supreme-court-blocks-largest-discrimination-case-in-nations-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil Rights Groups Call for Retroactive Application of Guidelines for Cocaine Sentencing</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/05/31/civil-rights-groups-call-for-retroactive-application-of-guidelines-for-cocaine-sentencing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/05/31/civil-rights-groups-call-for-retroactive-application-of-guidelines-for-cocaine-sentencing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 21:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=17577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>By <strong>Tyler Lewis<br />
</strong>A group of seven prominent national civil rights organizations that   includes The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights sent a   letter to the U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder urging him to support   the retroactive application of a new set of sentencing guidelines that   accompany the implementation of the Fair Sentencing Act (FSA), which   reduced the discriminatory sentencing disparity between crack cocaine   and powder cocaine offenses.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/05/31/civil-rights-groups-call-for-retroactive-application-of-guidelines-for-cocaine-sentencing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Expands Inmates’ Ability to Sue for DNA Testing</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/03/14/supreme-court-expands-inmates%e2%80%99-ability-to-sue-for-dna-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/03/14/supreme-court-expands-inmates%e2%80%99-ability-to-sue-for-dna-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=16797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By <strong>The Editors</strong><br />
A Supreme Court ruling last week has made it easier for prisoners to sue for access to DNA evidence that might prove their innocence – but not by much.</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2011/03/14/supreme-court-expands-inmates%e2%80%99-ability-to-sue-for-dna-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kagan Confirmed As The Nation’s Fourth Female Supreme Court Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/08/07/kagan-confirmed-as-the-nation%e2%80%99s-fourth-female-supreme-court-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/08/07/kagan-confirmed-as-the-nation%e2%80%99s-fourth-female-supreme-court-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 04:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Obama Presidency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=14422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By <strong>The Editors</strong>
Elena Kagan, the United States Solicitor General and former Dean of Harvard Law School, was confirmed by the Senate Thursday as the nation’s newest Justice of the Supreme Court.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/08/07/kagan-confirmed-as-the-nation%e2%80%99s-fourth-female-supreme-court-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Judiciary Committee Approves Kagan Nomination</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/07/20/senate-judiciary-committee-approves-kagan-nomination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/07/20/senate-judiciary-committee-approves-kagan-nomination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Obama Presidency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=14273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By <strong>The Editors</strong>
Solicitor General Elena Kagan, President Obama’s second nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court, moved a step closer to confirmation Tuesday when the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to send her nomination to the full Senate.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/07/20/senate-judiciary-committee-approves-kagan-nomination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Violence, Gun Rights, and Compassionate Progressivism</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/06/30/violence-gun-rights-and-compassionate-progressivism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/06/30/violence-gun-rights-and-compassionate-progressivism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=14050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By <strong>Khalil Gibran Muhammad</strong><br />
In the coming weeks, as Chicago officials extend handgun rights to its citizens in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision, and politicians debate whether or not urban residents will be better protected by armed soldiers, important lessons from the past should not go unheeded.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/06/30/violence-gun-rights-and-compassionate-progressivism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Bars Restrictive Gun-Control Laws</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/06/29/supreme-court-bars-restrictive-gun-control-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/06/29/supreme-court-bars-restrictive-gun-control-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 03:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=14063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By <strong>The Editors</strong>
For the second time in two years, the Supreme Court narrowly ruled that gun-control laws cannot abridge the right to bear arms the Second Amendment grants individuals. The decision came in a case challenging the gun-control laws of Chicago and a nearby suburb, Oak Park, Illinois, McDonald v. Chicago, No. 08-1521.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/06/29/supreme-court-bars-restrictive-gun-control-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAACP Legal Defense Fund Supports the Nomination of Elena Kagan to Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/06/25/naacp-legal-defense-fund-supports-the-nomination-of-elena-kagan-to-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/06/25/naacp-legal-defense-fund-supports-the-nomination-of-elena-kagan-to-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 02:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Obama Presidency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=14036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With only days until Senate confirmation hearings begin on the nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF) has released a report examining the nominee’s civil rights record.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/06/25/naacp-legal-defense-fund-supports-the-nomination-of-elena-kagan-to-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Text of Justice David Souter’s Speech: Harvard Commencement Remarks</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/06/04/text-of-justice-david-souter%e2%80%99s-speech-harvard-commencement-remarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/06/04/text-of-justice-david-souter%e2%80%99s-speech-harvard-commencement-remarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 03:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=13785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By <strong>Justice David H. Souter</strong>
Former Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter recently received a honorary degree from Harvard University, his undergraduate and law school Alma Mater, and delivered the Commencement Address. His speech was a concerted criticism of the conservative judicial doctrine of  “originalism,” which contends judicial decisions should be rendered by adhering to a strict reading of the Constitution.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/06/04/text-of-justice-david-souter%e2%80%99s-speech-harvard-commencement-remarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LDF Victory in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/28/ldf-victory-in-chicago/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/28/ldf-victory-in-chicago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 02:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=13722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By <strong>Stacey Patton</strong><br />
This week LDF won another significant victory in the Supreme Court.  In <em>Lewis v. Chicago</em>, the Court ruled unanimously that the City of Chicago can be held responsible for each time it used a hiring practice that arbitrarily blocked qualified black applicants from employment.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/28/ldf-victory-in-chicago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Justice Breyer on the Dred Scott Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/28/justice-breyer-on-the-dred-scott-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/28/justice-breyer-on-the-dred-scott-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 02:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=13704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In April Justice Stephen G. Breyer of the U.S. Supreme Court spoke at the New York Historical Society about the historical and present-day importance of the infamous Dred Scott decision, which played a critical role in bringing about the Civil War. We cannot think of a more fitting momemt  to contemplate Justice Breyer’s words than on Memorial Day, which began in 1868 in the North as a day to pay homage to the Civil War dead.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/28/justice-breyer-on-the-dred-scott-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAACP Legal Defense Fund Succeeds in Defending Rights of 6,000 African-American Applicants for Chicago Firefighter Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/24/naacp-legal-defense-fund-succeeds-in-defending-rights-of-6000-african-american-applicants-for-chicago-firefighter-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/24/naacp-legal-defense-fund-succeeds-in-defending-rights-of-6000-african-american-applicants-for-chicago-firefighter-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=13655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After years fighting for justice, qualified African-American job applicants will finally have a fair opportunity to land a job with the Chicago fire department. Today the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the City of Chicago can be held accountable for each and every time it used a hiring practice that arbitrarily blocked qualified minority applicants from employment.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/24/naacp-legal-defense-fund-succeeds-in-defending-rights-of-6000-african-american-applicants-for-chicago-firefighter-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Powerful Voice: Not Stilled, Still Heard</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/17/a-powerful-voice-not-stilled-still-heard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/17/a-powerful-voice-not-stilled-still-heard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 23:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=13576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>By Vernon E. Jordan, Jr.<br />
</strong>In New York State Thurgood Marshall Day --appropriately -- also marks the anniversary of a great American milestone.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/17/a-powerful-voice-not-stilled-still-heard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LDF Applauds Supreme Court Decision Declaring Life Without Parole Sentences for Children in Non-Homicide Cases Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/17/ldf-applauds-supreme-court-decision-declaring-life-without-parole-sentences-for-children-in-non-homicide-cases-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/17/ldf-applauds-supreme-court-decision-declaring-life-without-parole-sentences-for-children-in-non-homicide-cases-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 23:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=13572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The United States Supreme Court declared that children convicted of non-homicide offenses cannot be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The Court concluded that because adolescents are, by nature, less culpable than adults and because life without parole is an extreme sentence which is rarely imposed on teenagers, it is cruel and unusual punishment to sentence a child who has not killed to life without possibility of parole</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/17/ldf-applauds-supreme-court-decision-declaring-life-without-parole-sentences-for-children-in-non-homicide-cases-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three ways to preserve Brown v. Board&#8217;s promise</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/17/three-ways-to-preserve-brown-v-boards-promise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/17/three-ways-to-preserve-brown-v-boards-promise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 20:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=13563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By<strong> Damon Hewitt</strong>
Fifty-six years after the U.S. Supreme  Court rendered its landmark  decision in <em>Brown   v. Board of Education</em>, America is in a state of educational   emergency. Many students attend schools where they are more likely to be   suspended or expelled than to receive a high quality education. In   terms of high school graduation, the most basic of all indicators of   academic achievement, some students stand no better than a coin flip of a   chance.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/17/three-ways-to-preserve-brown-v-boards-promise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NAACP Legal Defense Fund Statement on Nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/11/naacp-legal-defense-fund-statement-on-nomination-of-elena-kagan-to-the-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/11/naacp-legal-defense-fund-statement-on-nomination-of-elena-kagan-to-the-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 21:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Obama Presidency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=13471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund congratulates Ms. Kagan on her nomination and calls upon the Senate to consider the nomination expeditiously.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/05/11/naacp-legal-defense-fund-statement-on-nomination-of-elena-kagan-to-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Visit from Justice Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/04/20/a-visit-from-justice-stevens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/04/20/a-visit-from-justice-stevens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=13199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By <strong>Olympia Duhart
<span style="font-weight: normal;">His visit demonstrated the commitment Justice Stevens typically displays to inclusion and access. It was also consistent with Justice Stevens’ alignment with “the little guy.” </span></strong>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/04/20/a-visit-from-justice-stevens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Cost of “Free Speech” in &#8216;Citizens United&#8217; for Black Candidates</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/04/13/the-cost-of-%e2%80%9cfree-speech%e2%80%9d-in-citizens-united-for-black-candidates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/04/13/the-cost-of-%e2%80%9cfree-speech%e2%80%9d-in-citizens-united-for-black-candidates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=13112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By <strong>Olympia Duhart</strong>
In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that corporations are allowed to dip into their deep pockets to spend money to help elect or defeat candidates. In fact, they can spend all they want to support or oppose any candidate. The case effectively rolls back decades of restrictions on political campaign expenditures by corporations.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/04/13/the-cost-of-%e2%80%9cfree-speech%e2%80%9d-in-citizens-united-for-black-candidates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LDF Praises Justice Stevens for His Years of Service</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/04/09/ldf-praises-justice-stevens-for-his-years-of-service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/04/09/ldf-praises-justice-stevens-for-his-years-of-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=13014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund wishes to commend Justice Stevens upon the announcement of his retirement from the Supreme Court at the end of this term.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/04/09/ldf-praises-justice-stevens-for-his-years-of-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LDF Defends Chicago Black Firefighters</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/02/22/ldf-defends-chicago-black-firefighters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/02/22/ldf-defends-chicago-black-firefighters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economic Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=12438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By <strong>The Editors</strong>
Washington, D.C. -- February 22 -- In a closely-watched case involving the hiring of black firefighters in Chicago, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. today urged the U.S. Supreme Court to prevent mis-interpreted technical rules from blocking the correction of discrimination in employment.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/02/22/ldf-defends-chicago-black-firefighters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The (Missed) Opportunity of a Lifetime</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/01/22/the-missed-opportunity-of-a-lifetime/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/01/22/the-missed-opportunity-of-a-lifetime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black history month]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Obama Presidency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=12011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By <strong>Leslie Proll</strong>
When President Obama took office last January, hopes were high that the right wing’s long stronghold on the federal courts had come to an end. LDF and other civil rights advocates were eager for a new day when fair and impartial judges would once again be nominated and confirmed in large numbers.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/01/22/the-missed-opportunity-of-a-lifetime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama at Year One</title>
		<link>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/01/22/obama-at-year-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/01/22/obama-at-year-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hot Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naacp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Obama Presidency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedefendersonline.com/?p=12014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By <strong>John Payton</strong><br />
A year ago, we could barely contain our excitement as we contemplated a historic achievement. Barack Obama had won a decisive victory. There was widespread enthusiasm for his Presidency. Right after the election, Gallup reported that 68 percent of the public was proud that Obama was President. His choices of Senator Hillary Clinton to be Secretary of State, of Eric Holder to be Attorney General and of Robert Gates to remain as Secretary of Defense were well received. His Inaugural speech was brilliant. We were looking forward to acknowledging and confronting fundamental problems that have plagued our society for decades.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thedefendersonline.com/2010/01/22/obama-at-year-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

